Skip to content
RO.00ROI / TCO calculator

1, 3 and 5-year TCO, three procurement paths.

Procurement boards compare three paths every time: build-from-scratch, hybrid stack from named vendors, or platform like FlyttGo. The calculator below sizes all three live across the same tier, region and module bundle — defensible first-pass numbers procurement can circulate.

RO.CLLive calculator
RO.OT · 3-year TCO
Saved vs build · 3y
€388,800
74% lower
Saved vs hybrid · 3y
€160,400
54% lower
Procurement pathYear 1 buildOperate / yr3y TCOTTM (mo)Team
FlyttGo · this platform€100,000€18,000€136,00043
Build from scratch€320,000€102,400€524,8001414
Hybrid · Palantir + AWS + Stripe components€195,000€50,700€296,40078
FlyttGo€136,000
Hybrid€296,400
Build€524,800

Build-from-scratch baseline assumes a 14-engineer team at L.04 fully-loaded European rate plus cloud + integration overhead. Hybrid baseline assumes a smaller team coordinating named-vendor components.

RO.MTMethodology

Defensible first-pass, not the final number.

  • RO.M1

    Three procurement paths

    FlyttGo (the live tier ladder), build-from-scratch (in-house team + cloud + integration), hybrid (named-vendor components — Palantir + AWS + Stripe).

  • RO.M2

    Five-input matrix

    Tier (L.03 → L.06), region (EU / MENA / Africa), horizon (1 / 3 / 5 years), module bundle, team size — every input drives the model live.

  • RO.M3

    Build vs. operate split

    Year-1 build cost separated from per-year operate cost. Highlights the long-tail run-rate institutional buyers underestimate.

Coefficients track Big-4 build-vs-buy literature for institutional platforms. Indicative ±15 %. Final number lands on the order form after the scoping engagement (SE.D2).